Is a Trojan a Rootkit ?

blog + SOC Z. Oualid today

share close

Trojans and rootkits rank among the most prevalent types of malicious software, frequently employed by attackers to have complete control over victims’ machines. Nevertheless, the question arises: Are trojans synonymous with rootkits?

A trojan is not inherently a rootkit. While both are types of malicious software, they serve distinct purposes. A trojan disguises itself as a legitimate program to deceive users, whereas a rootkit stealthily manipulates system processes to hide its presence.

Here is a table that list some of the differences between trojans and rootkits:

Deceptive AppearanceStealthy System Manipulation
Pretends to be LegitimateConceals Its Presence
Used for Unauthorized AccessEnables Persistent Access
Primary Aim: DeceptionPrimary Aim: Concealment
Spreads Through User ActionsOften Exploits System Vulnerabilities

If you want to learn more about what is the difference between a Trojan and a Rootkit, or if you want to see some real life examples of bot Trojans and Rootkits, then just keep reading.

What is a Trojan

In the realm of cybersecurity, a Trojan, much like its mythical namesake, operates surreptitiously, concealing its malicious intent behind a façade of legitimacy. Unlike viruses or worms, Trojans do not replicate themselves but rather infiltrate systems by posing as harmless or desirable software. Once unwittingly invited in by users, Trojans unleash their payload, which can range from unauthorized access and data theft to system disruption.

At its core, a Trojan horse relies on the art of deception. Commonly delivered through seemingly innocuous email attachments, infected software downloads, or deceptive links, Trojans exploit human vulnerability, relying on users’ trust to gain entry. The unsuspecting user, much like the ancient citizens of Troy, unknowingly welcomes the hidden threat within the confines of their digital fortress.

The payloads carried by Trojans vary, adapting to the diverse objectives of cybercriminals. Some Trojans specialize in providing remote access to attackers, allowing them to manipulate systems from afar. Others focus on stealing sensitive information, such as login credentials or financial data, compromising the integrity of personal and organizational security.

Detection and mitigation strategies against Trojans involve a combination of user education, vigilant cybersecurity practices, and the use of antivirus software. Regular system scans help identify and eliminate these deceptive threats before they can unleash their payload. Understanding the Trojan’s modus operandi is paramount in navigating the digital landscape, empowering users to fortify their defenses against these stealthy infiltrators and maintain the integrity of their digital domain. As we traverse the intricate terrain of cybersecurity, recognizing the deceptive nature of Trojans becomes a cornerstone in the ongoing battle to secure our interconnected digital world.

Some popular Trojans

Here is a list of some popular Trojans malwares in the cybersecurity history:

Zeus (Zbot)

Zeus, also known as Zbot, stands as one of the most notorious banking trojans, celebrated for its sophisticated capabilities in financial cybercrime. This insidious malware specializes in silently infiltrating systems to discreetly harvest sensitive data, with a primary focus on stealing online banking credentials. Its multifaceted capabilities include keylogging, form grabbing, and the ability to inject malicious content into legitimate websites, enabling attackers to manipulate user interactions seamlessly.

Zeus is renowned for its adaptability, continually evolving to bypass security measures and maintain its efficacy. Often distributed through phishing emails or drive-by downloads, Zeus has become a versatile tool in the arsenal of cybercriminals, facilitating various fraudulent activities such as unauthorized fund transfers, identity theft, and the propagation of other malicious payloads.


Emotet, a notorious malware strain, has gained infamy for its sophisticated and adaptive capabilities. Originally identified as a banking trojan, Emotet has evolved into a polymorphic and multifaceted threat. One of its primary strengths lies in its ability to serve as a delivery mechanism for other malware, making it a prominent distributor of various malicious payloads, including ransomware and banking trojans.

Emotet is often propagated through deceptive phishing emails containing malicious attachments or links. Once infiltrated, it can persistently compromise systems, evade detection through polymorphic coding, and exfiltrate sensitive data. Additionally, Emotet showcases a robust modular architecture, allowing threat actors to update and customize its functionalities, making it a formidable challenge for cybersecurity defenses.


Dridex, a notorious banking trojan, has distinguished itself through its sophisticated capabilities in financial cybercrime. This malware is designed to stealthily compromise systems, with a primary focus on stealing sensitive banking information and login credentials. Employing advanced techniques such as web injects and macro-laden documents delivered through phishing emails, Dridex bypasses traditional security measures to access financial data directly from users’ devices.

Known for its resilience and adaptability, Dridex has evolved over time, demonstrating a constant effort to evade detection and enhance its evasion techniques. Its modular architecture allows threat actors to update and modify its functionalities, making it a persistent and challenging adversary for cybersecurity professionals.


Cerberus, a potent Android banking trojan, has carved a niche in the realm of mobile cyber threats with its sophisticated capabilities. This malware is specifically engineered to target Android devices, aiming to compromise their security and pilfer sensitive financial information.

Cerberus boasts an array of capabilities, including keylogging, screen capturing, and the ability to intercept two-factor authentication codes, enabling cybercriminals to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access to banking accounts.

Its modular structure allows for frequent updates and adaptations, making it resilient against detection efforts. Often distributed through malicious apps or phishing schemes, Cerberus has become a significant player in the mobile threat landscape.


TrickBot, an insidious banking trojan turned multifaceted malware platform, showcases a spectrum of capabilities that transcend its initial focus. Originally identified as a banking trojan, TrickBot has evolved into a versatile threat delivery mechanism, often associated with facilitating other cybercriminal activities, including information theft and ransomware attacks. Its modular architecture allows threat actors to continually update and expand its functionalities, making it a dynamic and adaptive threat. TrickBot commonly infiltrates systems through phishing emails or malicious attachments, leveraging social engineering tactics to exploit user vulnerabilities.

Once embedded, TrickBot establishes persistence, enabling further compromise and facilitating the deployment of additional malicious payloads.

What a Rootkit

A rootkit emerges as a clandestine digital entity, distinguished by its stealthy maneuvering within a host system. Unlike overt malware such as viruses or Trojans, rootkits operate with a primary objective of concealing their presence, often seeking persistent access and control over the target machine. Rootkits achieve this surreptitious infiltration by manipulating core system processes and exploiting vulnerabilities.

The term “rootkit” draws its origin from the concept of obtaining root-level privileges on a Unix-based system, signifying the highest level of administrative access. Operating below the radar, these insidious programs can evade traditional detection methods, making them particularly challenging for users and security systems to identify.

Rootkits employ various techniques to establish and maintain their covert presence. They may exploit software vulnerabilities, engage in drive-by downloads, or infiltrate external devices, ensuring a sustained, often undetectable, foothold within the system. This persistence enables rootkits to execute various malicious activities, including privilege escalation, establishment of hidden backdoors, and discreet actions like keylogging.

Detection of rootkits poses a significant challenge due to their stealthy nature. Specialized anti-rootkit tools are essential to uncover these hidden threats, as conventional antivirus solutions may struggle to identify their presence. Mitigation often involves extensive measures, including full system reinstallation, to eradicate the rootkit and restore the system’s integrity.

In navigating the complex field of cybersecurity, understanding the mechanics of a rootkit is pivotal. This knowledge empowers users and cybersecurity professionals to implement effective countermeasures, ensuring the fortification of digital environments against these elusive and persistent threats. As we delve into the depths of digital security, recognizing the nuances of rootkits becomes paramount in the ongoing battle to secure our interconnected digital world.

Some popular Rootkits

Here is a list of some popular rootkit malwares in the cybersecurity history:


Stuxnet, a groundbreaking and highly sophisticated computer worm discovered in 2010, marked a watershed moment in cyber warfare. Primarily designed to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program, Stuxnet leveraged multiple zero-day vulnerabilities, making it exceptionally potent and difficult to detect. This rootkit not only infected systems but also manipulated programmable logic controllers (PLCs) in industrial facilities, causing physical damage to centrifuges used in uranium enrichment.

Stuxnet showcased unprecedented precision in its targeting, emphasizing its nation-state origin. Its modular architecture allowed it to adapt and evolve rapidly, making it one of the most complex and dangerous cyber weapons ever discovered. The Stuxnet incident revealed the potential for cyber threats to have real-world consequences, highlighting the need for heightened cybersecurity measures in critical infrastructure systems worldwide..

TDL (Alureon)

TDL, also known as Alureon, is a notorious rootkit family renowned for its stealthy and persistent nature. Operating at the kernel level, TDL embeds itself deep within the system, often infecting the Master Boot Record (MBR) to establish a persistent presence during the computer’s boot process. This rootkit is highly adaptable, capable of evading detection by traditional antivirus solutions and employing advanced anti-analysis techniques.

TDL has been associated with various cybercriminal activities, including banking trojan distribution and information theft. Notably, it can be leveraged to create botnets, forming networks of compromised computers for large-scale malicious operations. TDL’s resilience and ability to resist removal make it a challenging adversary.

ZeroAccess Rootkit

ZeroAccess Rootkit is a notorious malware known for its intricate capabilities and wide-ranging impact. This rootkit primarily operates as a Trojan horse and is notorious for engaging in click fraud schemes and Bitcoin mining activities. One of its distinctive features is its ability to maintain persistence on infected systems by consistently hiding and reinstalling itself, making traditional detection and removal methods challenging.

ZeroAccess is adept at evading antivirus measures, employing advanced evasion techniques to stay hidden within the system. Its modular architecture allows for frequent updates, ensuring adaptability to evolving security measures. Known for its sophisticated stealth and persistence, ZeroAccess poses a considerable threat to system security.


Rustock, a notorious rootkit, gained infamy for its association with widespread spam email campaigns. Operating as a sophisticated Trojan, Rustock demonstrated considerable capabilities in maintaining control over compromised systems. Its primary function involved transforming infected machines into part of a massive botnet, utilized for the distribution of spam emails, often promoting dubious products or malicious content. What set Rustock apart was its ability to employ stealthy tactics, making detection challenging.

The rootkit exhibited resilience by frequently updating its techniques, allowing it to persistently evade security measures

What is the difference between a trojan and a rootkit

As explained in the first sections of this blog post, Trojan and rootkit are totally different malware types. In this section we will dig deeper into the main differences between Trojans and Rootkits.


Trojans: Deceptive in nature, trojans disguise themselves as legitimate files or programs to trick users into executing them. Their primary goal is to grant unauthorized access, steal sensitive data, or cause system disruptions.

Rootkits: Focus on stealth and persistence. Rootkits aim to conceal their presence within the host system, often infiltrating core processes to enable long-term control. Their objectives include privilege escalation, establishing hidden backdoors, and engaging in discreet activities.

Infiltration Method:

Trojans: Often spread through phishing emails, malicious attachments, or deceptive links, exploiting human vulnerabilities for entry.

Rootkits: Exploit vulnerabilities to infiltrate a system, embedding themselves deep within the operating system. Some infect the Master Boot Record (MBR) for boot-level persistence.

Detection Challenges:

Trojans: Detectable by antivirus software and regular system scans, but user education on phishing threats is crucial for prevention.

Rootkits: Difficult to detect, requiring specialized anti-rootkit tools. Removal often involves extensive measures like full system reinstallation.

Payload and Activities:

Trojans: Varied payloads, including information theft, remote access, or system disruption. Versatile tools adapted for specific malicious purposes.

Rootkits: Focus on privilege escalation, establishment of hidden backdoors, and discreet activities like keylogging. Some rootkits may not be inherently malicious but can introduce security vulnerabilities.

Impact on System Integrity:

Trojans: Immediate impact, often causing disruptions or stealing information upon activation.

Rootkits: Prioritize long-term control and persistence, enabling discreet manipulation and privilege escalation.

User Interaction:

Trojans: Rely on user interaction, requiring users to execute or interact with the deceptive element.

Rootkits: Operate stealthily without requiring direct user interaction once infiltrated.

Removal Complexity:

Trojans: Removal through antivirus software and regular system scans is typically straightforward.Rootkits: Removal often involves specialized anti-rootkit tools and may require extensive measures, such as full system reinstallation.

Written by: Z. Oualid

Rate it

About the author

Z. Oualid

I am a Cyber Security Expert, I have worked with many companies around the globe to secure their applications and their networks. I am certified OSCP and OSCE which are the most recognized and hard technical certifications in the industry of cybersecurity. I am also a Certifed Ethical hacker (CEH). I hope you enjoy my articles :).

Previous post

Post comments (0)

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *